Apparently USFK and a nuclear waste dump have a lot in common in Korea now a days according to this Joong Ang Ilbo article:
The Pyeongtaek problem has in many ways the potential to become another Buan incident. The residents of Buan also had confrontations over the choice between the livelihood of the residents and the economic gains from the construction of nuclear waste disposal facilities. However, with the intervention of outside forces, the logic for environmental protection and the development logic collided each other and the problem was expanded to a national level and became a political issue, making it more difficult to solve.
We shouldn’t leave the Pyeong-taek situation alone so that it can become another Buan incident. In order to stop this, the government and local autonomous organizations must actively mediate friction among the residents over their livelihood and business interests. The greater the friction among the residents is, the more room there is for outside organizations to intervene. Therefore, minimizing the chances of internal friction is the shortcut to keeping the problem from expanding to the national level. After that, the government must make an effort to find a contact point where those parties to the Pyeongtak issue who emphasisze the importance of the alliance and those who emphasize the importance of peace can compromise.
Maybe a nuclear waste dump is a good analogy for USFK. A nuclear waste dump is something no one wants in their back yard but the pay off of cheap electrical power is worth the annoyance of keeping the nuclear waste dumps around. Maybe USFK is the same way; an annoyance but useful to keep around.
However, I think the USFK “nuclear waste dump” that is trying to be expanded in Pyongtaek is being held up by the local farmers, not because people don’t want it in their backyards, because Camp Humphreys is already in their backyards, but because they want more money from the government for their land. The anti-USFK parasites are just jumping on to this issue to try and make it look like the big American bullies are pushing around Korea again to further their own political agendas. They could care less about the farmers. However, once the farmers get their pay day from the government the majority of them will happily move out to greener pastures.
Here is something in the article I need to point out that just annoys me:
For the sake of our alliance with the United States, they want the Pyeongtaek issue to remain a non-political and local problem. They think that the Pyeongtaek problem can be solved by efforts to improve such procedural matters as eliminating unequal elements in the Korea-U.S. alliance, not by the demand to withdraw the U.S. forces from Korea.
Quick somebody name these unequal elements in the US-ROK alliance? This is a common quote I hear over and over again but never see anything to substantiate it. It is just something people like to throw out there because they hear it over and over again and just assume it to be a fact. If you know of any of these inequalities in the US-ROK alliance please feel free to comment.