First Signs of an All Volunteer ROK Army?

I have posted before that the long term readiness of the ROK Army will be affected if the Korean government does not do more to professionalize the force.  I say this because in the past, completing your mandatory service in the ROK military was considered a gate you passed to become a man in Korean society.  People who did not do their national service were looked down upon.  Today though it is the complete opposite, mandatory service is something at best to be avoided.  What has changed this attitude so drastically over the course of only a decade?  First all living standards have increased where people don’t want to spend two years of their lives living in a cramped barracks getting beat down by superiors for a next to nothing pay check.  Secondly and most importantly in my opinion is that the youth being conscripted into the ROK military do not see the North Korean threat as a legitimate threat to the nation.  The progressives in the South Korean educational system have successfully indoctrinated an entire South Korean generation into the bogus belief that North Korea is just some misunderstood uncle that doesn’t mean any harm to South Korea.  Don’t believe me?  Then read this.

This announcement by the ROK military is at least one small baby step towards professionalizing the force if it comes to pass:

The military is considering hiring about 40,000 “salaried volunteer soldiers” between 2011 and 2020 to help overhaul the military conscription system, sources at the Defense Ministry said Monday.

Under the plan, those who volunteer to remain in the military for an additional year after their two-year mandatory service would be paid an annual salary of about 15 million won, they said.

The ministry initially announced that it would maintain about 20,000 salaried voluntary servicemen but is considering increasing the number to fill the possible manpower gap from the reduction in service period, the sources said.

The Defense Ministry needs these volunteers because of the national government’s plan to reduce national service from 24 months to 18 months for most conscriptees.  It is speculated the ruling party is doing this just to score political points in this year’s presidential election with Korea’s youth population, which is probably the case, but I like the possible unintended consequence of having the military recruit volunteers instead of relying on draftees.

The pay of approximately $15,000 for that extra year is actually pretty competitive with the pay of an American military E4 with 2 years of service which comes out to $20,976.  You consider the cheaper of cost of living in Korea and it is pretty much even.  Plus if living conditions and treatment of the soldiers improves this may be appealing to many youths.  However, a professional military requires budget increases, which many in the government don’t want to give:

“We are in close consultation with related government agencies about the increase in the salaried soldiers as an alternative to the cut in the service period,” a ministry official said on condition of anonymity. “But the budget planning agency now opposes it, citing the whopping additional budget required.”

The Ministry of Planning and Budget estimates that about 1.2 trillion won of additional budget on top of the 621 trillion of defense spending for the Defense Reform 2020 scheme would be required only for soldiers’ payment, he said.

That is why I dislike the draftee system because the politicians can keep getting away with sending over a billion dollars to North Korea while Korean youths for two years are treated no better than a Kaseong slave labor worker.  I find it ironic that the amount of money needed to fund this voluntary service program is nearly equal to the amount of money being sent to North Korea this year.  If Korean youths really wanted to make a difference in this next election they should vote for someone who is going to legitimately work to create an all volunteer military so no one will have to be conscripted in the first place instead of the demagogues looking to score cheap political points at the expensive of national security and the welfare of their citizens.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mark
17 years ago

Trust me, not enough Koreans will volunteer. They'll have to field an army of third-country nationals.

Can an Iranian or Pakistani become a Korean citizen by volunteering to serve in the ROK Army? Would he want to?

My guess is that the ROK military will cease to be the racially pure institution it is today, much to the chagrin of Coreans worldwide.

mike mcstay
17 years ago

GI I am not sure about your comments about them not wanting to serve and it being looked down upon.

Please let me explain.

I teach at Woosong University in Daejeon South Korea. I teach Freshman and Sophomores Basic English, What I saw last semester gave me hope for the future of South Korea.

I had a few of my students unable to take their final exams because they had to do their service and they were looking forward to it. I have some that will be leaving this semester, once again, they know that they have 2 years to do and then they are done with it and then can continue their education and marry their girlfriends.

What I saw was the students who had avoided their service were looked down upon. The only exception was one student who had a handicap and would be inelligible to serve. One student claimed that his dad took care of it for him, was looked down upon.

I see a huge difference between the Fr (Who have not served) and the Soph. (Students who have all ready done their time) I have allot less whining from them and they seem more to want to learn English.

Maybe you and me have seen different things with these young men here but I liked it when my students wanted to serve and to get it over with.

GI Korea
17 years ago

Just from my personal experience I would say that 30% of the KATUSA soldiers I had in my unit from my last tour in Korea bitched and complained about having to serve and told me if they could have gotten out of serving they would. And I compare that experience to 7-8 years ago when I was in Korea where I would say only 10% were worthless. Keep in mind there is still 70% good soldiers committed to doing their duty but I see a trend that is growing and talking to KATUSAs I would good friends with they concurred with what I see as a growing trend of not wanting to do mandatory service for the reasons I stated. I have actually had a KATUSA tell me himself he felt mandatory service was worthless because NK was not a threat anymore and just misunderstood brothers.

I have a buddy of mine who is a CPT in the ROK army and he was telling me the same thing about soldiers entering into the ROK Army. He said the DMZ units are filled with the best soldiers and the ragbags are sent to non-front line units. So right now the front line units are very well trained and ready to protect the country, but he to is worried about 10-15 years down the road just like I am.

StKY
StKY
17 years ago

GI Korea,

Having been around ROK soldiers for over 8 straight years, I agree with most of your view point. The only correction I would make, though, is that: "The progressives in the South Korean educational system have successfully indoctrinated an entire South Korean generation into the bogus belief that North Korea is just some misunderstood uncle that doesn’t mean any harm to South Korea."

It's more like 2 or 3 generations by now. From 30 year old Korean peers to the 19 year old Rok soldier, they just don't see NK as anything that should be worried about.

Mark
17 years ago

Maybe they'll institute some sort of save pay. $150 a month extra if you're in TROKA, $100 if you're in FROKA, and $50 for SROKA.

trackback
17 years ago

[…] First Signs of an All Volunteer ROK Army? at ROK Drop said, […]

ATACMS
ATACMS
15 years ago

South Korean decision makers seem to start with the premise that in the event North Korea implodes there will be at least several million new street beggars in Seoul and this will be a costly development for the country. At the same time, it is doubtful that the Japanese government looks forward to having millions of starving, displaced refugees on boats, inner tubes, and pieces of wood, paddling towards Japan. It appears that both the ROK and Japan may figure it is far cheaper to simply provide enough food to keep everybody where they now are. Baby Kim will be gone one day and then the North Koreans can be brought, screaming and kicking, into the 18th century. Until then, the idea of status quo seems to have its appeal to ROK and Japanese politicians. I will say that it is a big mistake to send money to the North, both the ROK and Japan would be far better served by limiting their welfare exclusively to food—the emperor like lifestyle of Kim Junior doesn't need any help.

7
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x