North Korea’s Unofficial Spokesman Speaks Up

The Asian Times continues to produce some great articles about North Korea. This article about, Kim Myong-chol, a North Korean advocate living in Japan is really interesting.

Meet Kim Myong-chol, perhaps North Korea’s only avid and available Westernized talking head for one of the world’s most mysterious regimes. This very unofficial diplomat is a short, graying, gregarious man of 60 who lives in Japan, talks non-stop and rapid-fire and prefers the United States to Japan, where he now lives. Of course, he loves North Korea, and his mission is to try to educate the world about the Pyongyang government and how people there live, but he does so – despite his pointed messages – in a tactful, friendly manner, not as a shrill, angry polemicist who alienates his audience.

A friendly, warm, North Korean advocate. This guy really is different. Here is a little bit about his views:

Kim said he feels more comfortable in the United States than in Japan, though he did not expand beyond saying that he likes the people and has quite a few friends among US military officers, scholars and university professors. He has no problems with Americans as people – it’s the government policies on the Korean Peninsula and North Asia that he objects to.

Kim frequently delivers sharp messages about the correctness of North Korean policy and what he calls benighted US policy. But he’s no clone of the North’s official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA). He views politics as distinct from people and enjoys engaging the press and pundits on North Korean theory. He has an intimate knowledge of Korean culture and history and how it relates to the current political atmosphere with both Japan and the US.

Kim travels to the US several times a year, giving talks and speeches at universities and think-tanks about North Korea.

I’m not surprised that he is being payed to spread communist ideology in American college campuses. When I was in college I had to listen to a communist preach his views on globalization during a economics class. When he found out I was in the Army reserves he called me a war criminal for various reasons. That guy I found out was payed a $1,500 speaking fee by my university. I’m sure Mr. Kim here is probably raking in something comparable. You got to love communists that use capitalism when it benefits them. Anyway, there is more:

Although he holds Japanese citizenship and lives in Japan, Kim is firmly Korean, attracted to North Korea because of its policy of self-reliance and independence from the outside world. “Why do I like North Korea? Its political will to be independent from all foreigners – from China, from Russia – this is a point that attracts me,” Kim said. “Which is better, hungry wolf or fat dog?”

If he is trying to imply North Korea is a hungry wolf I would have to disagree. North Korea’s leadership are all fat dogs just like Mr. Kim is a fat dog living in Japan.

Kim also believes the US should sign a peace treaty ending the armistice with North Korea.

Kim, who is the executive director of his own organization, the Center for Korean-American Peace, which he founded in 1999, does offer a colorful, impassioned perspective on North Korea and how the country deals with the outside world. Kim says that to make progress on the nuclear issue, the United States must sign a peace treaty with North Korea, officially ending the 51-year-old armistice agreement.

The United States has shunned North Korea’s bid for a bilateral peace treaty with Washington, seeing it as a move by Pyongyang to splinter ties with allied countries who participated in the 1950-53 Korean War. “From the North Korean point of view, unless America is willing to concede on that point, North Korea has no reason to give up nuclear deterrence,” Kim said.

The only way the Norks will get a treaty is by allowing in a bunch of inspectors with unrestricted access to the country. The Norks would never allow this so I wouldn’t count on a treaty any time soon. Here is the scariest part of his rhetoric:

Kim scoffed at the widely quoted US Central Intelligence Agency estimate that North Korea may have one or two functioning nuclear weapons. He said the country has between 100 and 300 weapons based on a nuclear program active since the 1960s. He maintains that it was North Korea that aided Pakistan with its program.

Nuclear weapons, Kim says, are the only way for a small country such as North Korea to balance the scale against the United States. Nuclear weapons are also cheaper than conventional forces, Kim said: an army must be fed, and soldiers could be prone to division.

“For the moment, North Korea sees no sense in selling nuclear technology,” Kim said. “But as long as America remains hostile, we have every reason to sell whatever we have.”

That kind of talk causes US policymakers to bristle: an estranged North Korea aiding terrorist groups with nuclear technology is among the worst imaginable scenarios. Kim Jong-il is unlikely to give up his nuclear card easily even though he wants a peace treaty and diplomatic relations with the United States, Kim Myong-chol asserted.

“Kim Jong-il’s goal,” his unofficial spokesman said, “is to neutralize or nullify the American military presence.”

I cannot imagine North Korea having 100-300 nuclear weapons and if they ever sold one to a terrorist group I cannot believe the US would allow that to happen. I wish the Asia Times would of challenged the guy on the North Korean defector issue and rising anti-Kim Jong Il sentiment in the country with the recent release of anti-Kim Jong Il tapes. I think his answers would be interesting. However, it does appear that this guy is just like every other North Korean advocate, full of hot air; even if he is a friendlier, warmer, talking head.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Paul H.
Paul H.
19 years ago

A fascinating post GI.

Many possibilities for comment, but the following quote from the article struck me:

"The United States has shunned North Korea's bid for a bilateral peace treaty with Washington, seeing it as a move by Pyongyang to splinter ties with allied countries who participated in the 1950-53 Korean War."

I suspect you have a potential interest in this topic (ie your post about the memorial to the British unit that stopped the Chinese attack in early 1951) so maybe you'd comment further.

I'm incredulous at the implication of the Asia Times. Do they seriously think that any of the other nations (mostly NATO) who contributed forces to fight against North Korea/China in 1950-53 would consider doing so again in a future Korean conflict. Or am I reading their statement wrongly?

I assume that every NATO country except us has an embassy (or at least some sort of diplomatic mission) in Pyongyang now. I think I read that the Brits established one just a few years ago.

Is there any even symbolic military presence of such countries remaining in 8th Army? Even a liasion officer or two? I see that the "UN Command" name is retained in the force structure: http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/agency/arm

An infantry captain peer of mine (mid 1980's) had a wall plaque from Korea with several int'l flags on it. He had commanded some type of "honor guard", I think at Panmunjon. My impression was that this ceremonial unit had some sort of symbolic membership from countries of the former UN command from the Korean war, but I think he also told me that it had been disbanded thereafter.

I suspect that the diplomats of our NATO allies would spit their coffee if some naive US statesman, diplomat, or military officer suggested to one of them that they seriously participate in the future ground defense of ROK — under any circumstances. I doubt if Nork needs to "splinter" such ties — I suspect they were toothpicks a long time ago.

Paul H.
Paul H.
19 years ago

As a follow-up to my comment above, here's a link to US Army official history of Korean war which you might find interesting.
http://www.army.mil/cmh-pg/books/korea/truce/ch4….

Scroll down to page 57, chart #2, entitled – U.N. COMMAND/FAR EAST COMMAND, MAJOR GROUND FORCES, 1 JULY 1951.

An interesting line diagram that will show all the major US, ROK and also allied forces under UN command at that point in time. A quick scan to see what different NATO/ Western/ pro-US allies were present is interesting and some are surprising, at least to me.

I'm pretty sure the French battalion listed on the chart was a motorized/ mechanized/ armored one, and that it was redeployed to Indochina right after leaving Korea. I think it was soon thereafter essentially destroyed, in a massive road ambush by the Viet Minh. I'm almost positive the story is covered in detail in one of Bernard Fall's several books on the Indochina conflicts.

(The main web site is the one for Center for Military History. It appears that 5 volumes pertaining to Korean war are on line, don't know if there are others. The organization of the volumes is eclectic (ie they are not necessarily chronological). This cite is from the third one listed, entitled "Truce Tent and Fighting Front").

I had looked this chart up a few months ago when curious about this question, so I was able to find it again readily. About as current to the current Korean situation as studying Jurassic era dinosaur bones, I suppose, but some people are actually interested in history — go figure.

GI Korea
GI Korea
19 years ago

At the JSA their is actually an area of the camp where a handful of Norwegian and Swiss military officers work at that represent the United Nations. That is is it for international soldiers in Korea. It is also unlikely that any of the UN nations that helped during the Korean War would aid Korea again because any war in Korea would be an extremely quick conflict. The North Koreans can only sustain an offensive for approximately 8 days. I would be surprised if they could go even that long. So ironically the two countries Koreans protest the most about, America and Japan are the only countries with the ability to come to Korea's aid quickly.

Something really good that Korea did in honor of all the countries involved in the Korean War was to create a wall similar to the US Vietnam Wall at the Korean War Memorial musuem in Seoul that lists the names of every Korean, American and international soldier that died in the war. The American names are listed by state on the wall. Many individual states lost more people in the war than many of the international countries involved. Then like now the two international countries that lost by far the most people in the war were the US and England.

3
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x