There is a good interview with USFK commander General Bell in today’s Stars and Stripes. Here is what he had to say about the transfer of war time command:
The top U.S. military commander on the peninsula said U.S. and South Korean officials hope to have a ¿road map¿ toward independent military commands here completed by October.
U.S. Army Gen. B.B. Bell, who heads the Combined Forces, U.S. Forces Korea and United Nations commands, said he hopes to have a macro-level road map approved at an October security consultative meeting in Washington, D.C.
¿So we¿re conducting a range of meetings ¿ in hopes of laying out these road maps,¿ he said in an interview with Stars and Stripes last week. ¿I don¿t know if we¿ll make it ¿ but we¿re working on it.¿
Under current agreements, Bell directs U.S. and South Korean combat operations in time of war. In October 2005, South Korea said it wanted wartime operational command of its own forces, launching current studies.
The difficulty is neither drafting a plan nor saying that the nations have agreed to a deadline for setting up independent commands, Bell said. Rather, what¿s more difficult, he said, is enacting the plan and meeting the deadline.
The key sentence is enacting the plan and meeting the deadline which is being delayed because of the ROK government’s unwillingness to bare the cost of the independent command. It is easy for the ROK politicians to demagogue this issue, but when pressed to actually implement it they begin dragging their feet. However, it appears that General Bell is going to keep pushing the issue on them.
Here is what he had to say about possible withdrawal of land combat forces on the peninsula:
Asked whether the goal of restructuring implied fewer ground soldiers ¿ or additional Air Force or Navy assets on the peninsula ¿ Bell said, ¿Not at all. We¿re not anywhere near that kind of level of fidelity.¿
Maybe not now, but I’m sure it is not far from US policy makers minds though.
General Bell’s comment about the lack of US Air Force training range is especially pointed:
In the Security Forum speech, Bell also stressed the need for a modern air-to-ground training range. He said that lacking such a range in South Korea, he¿d ¿be forced to pursue other approaches¿ to train U.S. crews.
Asked whether ¿other approaches¿ meant moving Air Force crews out of South Korea either temporarily or permanently, Bell declined to provide specifics.
A range requires electronic devices to rate aircrews, Bell said. ¿You¿re not just looking for a splash of water or a big field of dirt somewhere. You¿re looking ¿ to score the capabilities of these aircrews.¿
Bell said officials believed they¿d have that type of range soon after South Korea closed the Kooni Range Complex in August 2005. He said he thought it appropriate to remind the National Assembly of this and to emphasize how important he considers it.
¿One thing is for sure,¿ Bell said. ¿We are not going to allow American aircrews to go into a war, or to propose that they can deter a war, unless they¿re trained and ready.¿
¿If I can¿t get access to an air-to-ground range, I¿m going to have to do something.¿
He is absolutely right about the Air Force needing a training range. Would you send the Army into war without going to the rifle range and qualifying on your assigned weapon? If the US Air Force goes then the US ground troops won’t be far behind them along with the US-ROK alliance. All this over BS environmental and noise pollution at Kooni Range. The South Koreans politicians are about to reap what they sowed and General Bell appears determined to make it happen.