The Flying Yangban has a really good post that provides a good summary and analysis of the North Korean defector issue. It appears the Yangban has been all over this one for while. Go check it out.
Category: Uncategorized
Japanese Urged to Boycott North Korean Products
When I read Japanese were boycotting North Korean products I immediately thought of, boycott what counterfeit US dollars and Nork heroin? However, North Korea actually does have some legimate exports to Korea besides the illegal variety.
But although the number of consumer goods bearing North Korean labels has visibly declined of late, experts on the reclusive state are divided over whether this means fewer products are coming in or they are merely being given another country of origin, including seafood caught in North Korean waters but identified as Russian or Chinese.
During the first half of 2004, cheap North Korean-made products, including suits, could easily be found at discount outlets, while supermarkets stocked a variety of cheap seafood labeled as being from North Korea.
On the other end of the spectrum, boxes of expensive North Korean “matsutake” mushrooms were prominently displayed in the better supermarkets, selling for 10,000 yen to 20,000 yen each.
Now is the “Great North Korean Boycott” having any impact on North Korea? According to this guy it is:
Lee Young Hwa, a professor at Kansai University who is an expert on the North Korean economy, said the effort has had some effect.
“You used to see advertisements in the media and on the streets pitching stores selling North Korean-made suits for 10,000 yen. You don’t see the ads, nor the suits, as much as you used to,” he said. “More and more Japanese will no longer buy goods they know are North Korean, even if those goods are extremely cheap.”
The fashion set may breath a sigh of relief that, thanks to boycott pressure, North Korean suits are no longer easily found.
I have never seen any store selling North Korean suits when I have gone to Japan but I find it hard to believe Nork suits have Japanese clothing companies on edge. Next time I go to Japan I am going to have to buy me a North Korean suit just for the novelty of owning one. I would love to compare the quality between Itaewon tailors and North Korean slave labor.
Some How I Don’t See This Happening
I will be amazed if this construction project ever happens Building a road from China to Taipei just doesn’t seem possible. But going to the moon not to long ago never seemed possible, so who knows maybe the Chinese can do it.
USFK Not to Be Deployed in Regional Conflicts
American troops in South Korea will not get involved in regional disputes without consent from Seoul, the U.S. ambassador to South Korea said Tuesday.
U.S. troops will not be mobilized for purposes other than defending the country from a North Korean invasion without full consultation with the South Korean government and taking care to safeguard the country’s security, Ambassador Christopher Hill said.
Hill made the statement on the embassy’s community website, Cafe USA (caf¿.daum.net/usembassy), in reply to a question whether the realignment of U.S. forces in South Korea would allow them to automatically intervene in a possible conflict between China and Taiwan.
He also said the U.S. was supportive of intra-Korean exchanges, including the Kaesong Industrial Complex Project, adding the White House would be even more positive were the North truly to abandon its nuclear development program.
Turning to the deployment of patriot missiles in Gwangju, the ambassador said the move was not part of the U.S.’ Missile Defense program but came at the request of the South Korean government to defend the country.
A conflict between Taiwan and China has always made me wonder if Korea is willing to fight for democracy in a country that is very similar to itself. Taiwan like Korea is a small country, with a hard working & educated population that has emerged from an authoritarian past to become a thriving democracy. If Korea is not willing to aid in the defense of Taiwan, than why should anyone aid in the defense of Korea? What is the difference between the two situations? Very little. They are both living under the point of a gun by communist thugs who they like to think the best of.
So if war was to come to Taiwan would Seoul be willing to side with the forces of democracy and fight China? I seriously doubt Seoul would ever go to war with China. They would probably try to stay neutral in the conflict but I don’t see how they could when they have thousands of US soldiers located on their peninsula that are a stone throw from the Chinese mainland. What do you all think?
Amnesty for North Korean Leaders
Andrei Lankov over at North Korea Zone has an interesting article published in the International Herald Tribune about amnesty for North Korean leaders before any reunification between the two Koreas can occur.
Then what would be the fate of North Korea’s leaders? Unlike their ex-Soviet comrades, they have few if any ways to transform themselves into successful capitalists or democratic politicians. Even if they manage to follow the example of the new Russian super-rich and privatize state-owned companies, these rusty, antiquated plants will not be of great value, especially if large South Korean conglomerates move in. Capitalism in the North will be built by the managers of Samsung and LG Korea, not by born-again Communist apparatchiks.
And then there is a fear of persecution. This is not paranoia. The regime has committed many crimes. For decades, the North Korean population has been treated with a systematic ferocity the world has not seen since the collapse of Pol Pot’s Kampuchea. Torture is a normal part of any investigation, and the families of more serious political criminals are also sent to prison. About 200,000 people are incarcerated in prison camps which rival Stalin’s in their brutality.
The Communist bosses cannot even hope to run and find asylum somewhere. Even if a country like Russia or China agreed to accept them (and that’s a big if), there are few chances that they would be safe if Seoul demands their extradition. We saw it before when the former East German strongman, Erich Honecker, sought asylum in Moscow but was arrested and extradited by a new Russian government. Moscow didn’t feel much loyalty for a man who had been Moscow’s best (and very efficient) ally for decades.
Thus the North Korean elite is cornered. These people do not want to tamper with the existing system, since they are afraid it would collapse. They have nothing to gain and everything to lose – not only their privilege and power, but also their freedom and perhaps even their lives.
What can be done? The short answer is amnesty. People who run the country should be granted immunity from persecution for all crimes committed during the 60-odd years of their rule. I am fully aware that we are talking about people who were in many respects as bad as Stalin and Hitler. But amnesty is necessary – not for them, of course, but for countless people whose lives would be so much better if the North Korean leaders were less persistent in their rejection of reforms.
Make sure you read the rest on your own.
Mr. Lankov is probably right about providing amnesty but I don’t think even that would get these thugs to change their ways. As long as they feel secure with their power and there is no real threat to them losing it, it is in their interest to keep things the way it is. So these thugs are not going to begin reforms because they are given amnesty or suddenly care about their people. They will begin reforms only when it is a last resort. Thus a variety of international pressures such as embargoes, sanctions, and aiding refugees is needed to destabalize the regime.
Amnesty is useful in preventing a full scale war. If the North Korean leaders feel they have no other options to keep their power then they will choose to start a war. However, if they know they have guaranteed amnesty then they would think twice about starting a war because they are sure to die with that option. But there is always the whole “Korean Pride” thing to worry about. They may rather choose to go down in a blaze of glory instead of accepting amnesty and the loss of “face” in stepping down from power and allowing the world to see what the “Workers Paradise” is really about.
I don’t really see the North Korean leaders choosing this option like Saddam Hussein did in Iraq becuase the Nork leadership does not have the concern about how the Korean people will view them historically in the future. Saddam did not want to be viewed in Arab history as someone who gave in to the Americans to save his own hide and Arabs to an extent admired him for standing up to the Americans until he was drug out of a spider hole. However, nobody in Korea will admire the Norks for standing up to America. They will just be hated more. So accepting amnesty would look more favorably on them historically because they would be saving many Korean lives. So amnesty is a useful option.
Does North Korea Really Have Nuclear Weapons?
Interesting article in the January/February Foreign Affairs magazine concerning the possibility that Washington may be wrong about North Korea’s nuclear capabilities, much the same way they were wrong about Saddam Hussein’s stockpiles of WMD.
Much has been written about the North Korean nuclear danger, but one crucial issue has been ignored: just how much credible evidence is there to back up Washington’s uranium accusation? Although it is now widely recognized that the Bush administration misrepresented and distorted the intelligence data it used to justify the invasion of Iraq, most observers have accepted at face value the assessments the administration has used to reverse the previously established U.S. policy toward North Korea.
But what if those assessments were exaggerated and blurred the important distinction between weapons-grade uranium enrichment (which would clearly violate the 1994 Agreed Framework) and lower levels of enrichment (which were technically forbidden by the 1994 accord but are permitted by the nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty [NPT] and do not produce uranium suitable for nuclear weapons)?
A review of the available evidence suggests that this is just what happened. Relying on sketchy data, the Bush administration presented a worst-case scenario as an incontrovertible truth and distorted its intelligence on North Korea (much as it did on Iraq), seriously exaggerating the danger that Pyongyang is secretly making uranium-based nuclear weapons. This failure to distinguish between civilian and military uranium-enrichment capabilities has greatly complicated what would, in any case, have been difficult negotiations to end all existing North Korean nuclear weapons programs and to prevent any future efforts through rigorous inspection.
The writer of the article Selig Harrison also believes the Bush Administration created the nuclear crisis to prevent a warming of relations between South Korea and Japan with North Korea. Any warming of relations between the countries would mean that North Korea policy would be driven by those two countries more than the United States.
American anxieties only grew, however, when, on September 17, 2002, Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi visited Pyongyang to discuss the normalization of relations–a visit that Japan had been quietly exploring for more than nine months without telling the United States. Washington, in fact, found out about the trip only three weeks before it occurred, when Koizumi presented the upcoming visit as a fait accompli to Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage. Koizumi did not ask for U.S. permission to go to North Korea, and he refused to call off the trip even after Armitage revealed Washington’s suspicions about a secret North Korean uranium program.
Faced with the prospect that the North Korea policies of South Korea and Japan had slipped out of its control, the Bush administration “saw a real possibility that its options on the [Korean] peninsula would increasingly be driven by the policy agendas of others,” wrote Jonathan Pollack, chairman of the Strategic Research Department at the U.S. Naval War College in the summer of 2003. Plans for Kelly’s visit to Pyongyang were accelerated, and his showdown with North Korean leaders came less than three weeks after Koizumi’s meeting with Kim Jong Il.
I do have to admit that the timing of the crisis was a little strange considering Koizumi had just visited the country. When the crisis first materialized, I thought it was really weird because the US had another crisis on its hands with North Korea at the same time it was preparing for war with Iraq. I’m making an assumption here that the US must of knew about the nuclear cheating for a while before going public with it, so Mr. Harrison at least offers a theory about why the information was made public at that time and that was to keep strong Washington influence in all North Korea policy.
I tend to disagree, I think the crisis came up at the time to strengthen the pre-emptive strike doctrine to eliminate thug dictators trying to aquire WMD before they get them. Kim Jong Il already had them so we can’t do much with him but Saddam hasn’t gotten nukes yet so we need to take him out now. I think any concerns about influence in North Korea policy was secondary at best.
The article continues on to make a strong argument that North Korea’s nuclear program is not as advanced as the public is made to believe. I only hope Mr. Harrison is right about this because a nuclearized North Korea is a scary proposition. The upcoming year should prove interesting on how this issue is resolved.
The author of the article Selig Harrison is Director of the Asia Program and Chairman of the Task Force on U.S. Korea Policy at the Center for International Policy. He is also a Senior Scholar at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and the author of Korean Endgame. What that all means I don’t know but I assume he is a pretty smart guy so check out his article and judge for yourself.
Sangju, a Korean Alamo
Interestingly enough while passing through the nice and quiet city of Sangju located in Kyeongsangbuk-do province I noticed a really nice Confucian looking building.
Upon exploration of the site, I was surprised to learn that the building was built in memory of a battle that took place here in April 1592 against the invading Japanese forces led by Toyotomi Hideyoshi. Hideyoshi was looking to conquer Korea in a bid to build his own wealth and power in order to make a stronger case to be declared Shogun of all of Japan by the Japanese emperor. The city of Sangju takes pride in the fact that this city was the first location in Korea where the citizens took up arms and joined forces with the Korean government army to fight the Japanese invaders.
Unfortunately the Korean army and the volunteers from Sangju were surprised by a Japanese attack and proceeded to be slaughtered by the overwhelming Japanese invaders. The battle took place in the vicinity of the Pukchon River and the foothills of Chasan Mountain where the present memorial is located. Though the Battle of Sangju was a rout by the Japanese forces it was a rallying cry and the beginning of a prolonged effort by the Korean Army and it’s citizens to fight the Japanese. They formed guerrilla groups and proceeded to attack and harrass the Japanese forces. This is the closest historical battle in Korea I have seen that can almost be described as a Korean “Alamo”.
With help from China and the many naval engagements won by legendary Korean General Yi Sun-shin and his turtle boats, the Koreans were able to finally expel the Japanese invaders in December of 1592. The country was devestated by the invasion with many cultural relics lost, buildings and homes burned, kidnappings of artisans, and a host of other tradgedies. Hideyoshi lost many men and money in his Korean venture and actually tried to attack Korea again in 1597 where he was soundly defeated by the combined Korean and Ming Chinese forces. Though Korea experienced much devestation the Koreans remained free from the Japanese and it all began here in the city of Sangju. I guess that is something to be proud of.
Soon Kaeseong Will Open to Tourism
Kaeseong just to the Northwest of the JSA will soon open to tourism from the South according to the Joong Ang.
Gaeseong isn’t all about factories and stainless steel pots. Behind its fledgling inter-Korean capitalism, this cityhas a rich cultural heritage, and a plan to make the most of this potential tourist attraction is in the works.
Details have yet to be firmed up, but South Korean citizens will be able to travel to Gaeseong starting early this year, according to a staffer at Hyundai Asan, which handles the inter-Korean tourism programs in the North.
The capital of the Goryeo Dynasty from 918 to 1392, Gaeseong has historical sites that include royal tombs, traditional houses and a museum, among other attractions. The tourism plan focuses on Gaeseong’s history, but Hyundai Asan plans to add a bit of modern atmosphere with a 375,000-square-yard complex including an amusement park, a golf course and a park called the Hill of Peace.
Once tour programs begin, the Korea National Tourism Organization expects Gaeseong to draw 440,000 visitors a year. This city seems poised to become the North’s number-two tourist attraction, behind Mount Geumgang.
I’m not sure how popular this tour will be because Kaeseong is no where near as beautiful as the Kumgangsan area of North Korea. Just go to the JSA and look North at the barren and deforested mountains to confirm this. So if somebody wanted to spend money to see North Korea I am sure they would pick Kumgangsan over Kaeseong. However, with it’s close proximity to Seoul, Kaeseong may be able to attract some day trippers from Seoul trying to experience the novelty of going to North Korea if the price is cheap enough to go there. For some reason golfing in Kaeseong just doesn’t appeal to me.
American Married to a North Korean
Interesting article in the Korea Times from an American married to a North Korean.
I am a U.S. citizen who is married to a North Korean Defector. Perhaps the only one. I met my wife in China and assisted her in getting to a third country to surrender at a South Korean Embassy. This was not easy and was very costly. When we finally got to the third country safely and went to the South Korean Embassy in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, in order for her to surrender, she was rejected. The consul there told us to go to the U.S. Embassy. Only after repeated threats by myself and friends, who were newspaper reporters, was she given a Korean visa in order for her to go to Korea and surrender.
In talking to other defectors, they also give similar stories of getting into South Korean missions in China only to be tossed out and told to go to another country.
Also, the welcome here was not warm. When we arrived in Seoul, both my wife and I were both physically and verbal abused by personnel of the NIS. There were no welcoming flowers or press, only harsh questions and abusive language. The harassment still continues with threatening phone calls from police and the NIS.
Please don’t be fooled by the propaganda of this administration.
Marc Simkins Seoul, Korea
Interesting, he is the only American I have ever heard of married to a North Korean. Anyone else hear of any other similar stories?
Details of USFK Deployment Now Made Clear
Details of the USFK deployment to assist Tsunami disaster areas has now been made public.
The deployment will consist of three groups. One company of 125 men and eight CH-47 Chinook helicopters would be temporarily transferred from 8th U.S. Army’s 2nd Battalion, 52nd Aviation Regiment, 17th Aviation Brigade, while 200 men and officers from the 18th Medical Command will await the order to move out. Moreover, 48 men from the 554th RED HORSE (Rapid Engineer Deployable Heavy Operational Repair Squadron, Engineer) squadron, based at Osan Air Base, are scheduled to inspect runways in Thailand, Sri Lanka and Indonesia.
None of these units are from 2ID. They are all located on camps south of 2ID. So I won’t being going any where but I would love an opportunity to be part of something like this. Apparently USFK is handling this deployment much better then the 2nd Brigade deployment this past summer where no consulation was done with Korean authorities.
USFK spokeswoman Col. MaryAnn Cumming said Thursday that the decision to send the troops was made following close consultations with the Korean government, and that the date of their departure has yet to be decided.
I look at this as a great opportunity for Korea to deploy troops in conjunction with the USFK deployment. This would be a great thing for the alliance and a chance for Korea to demonstrate international leadership. It is also a chance for Korea to upstage their arch-rivals, Japan. Japan would be hard pressed to send soldiers due to their past brutal occupation of many areas in Southeast Asia. Korea is looked upon favorably in the area and their assistance would be greatly welcomed. Plus the ROK Army is more than capable of executing this mission. I doubt they will do it, but it would be a big step to repairing the battered alliance. Then again some people don’t want to repair the alliance.

