ROK Drop Open Thread – September 19, 2025

Please leave anything you want to discuss in the comments section.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

18 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
setnaffa
setnaffa
7 months ago

It’s a beautiful day!!!

Time for everyone to think about the good things in their lives!!!

liz
liz
7 months ago

Well said, Setnaffa!
Hope you’re having a great day. 🙂

Preston Tucker
Preston Tucker
7 months ago

An important aspect of the Jimmy Kimmel situation has not received sufficient attention.

By suggesting that Charlie’s death was the result of an assassination carried out by supporters of former President Trump, Kimmel conveyed an implicit message: that if a conservative is killed, those responsible would be shielded from scrutiny, the incident would be minimized, and the loss would be treated as less significant. The implication was that further acts of violence against conservatives would not be met with serious condemnation.

Executives at ABC received numerous complaints from network affiliates regarding this claim. In response, they asked Kimmel to issue a correction or apology. He declined and instead stated his intention to maintain his position. Following this refusal, ABC terminated his contract.

Broadcast networks such as ABC, NBC, and CBS receive substantial advantages and privileges through federal regulation and access to public resources, with the expectation that they serve the public interest. These privileges carry a responsibility not to knowingly disseminate information that is demonstrably false or likely to cause harm.

In this case, Jimmy Kimmel was not removed from his position because of victimization, but because he chose to make and stand by a false claim. The person who lost his life—Charlie—remains the true victim of this situation.

liz
liz
7 months ago

Kimmell had lost most of his audience.
In 2020 he had almost 2 million viewers.
By 2025…here is the chart.

Screenshot-2025-09-21-at-7.08.06-AM
James Whitlock
James Whitlock
7 months ago

I haven’t watched any late-night TV since before Letterman retired and these days, I go to bed nice and early and bonus, I don’t even have cable TV. The only streaming service I have is Netflix. Today’s youth are glued to their phones almost 24/7 where it’s TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube.

liz
liz
7 months ago

PSA for PSA testing…
Another friend of ours passed away yesterday evening from prostate cancer. He was in his 60s. Another friend was in his 40s and passed away from it. When I worked in the nursing home (about ten years ago now) most of our elderly gentlemen had prostate cancer…but it wasn’t typically what killed them. Now things have changed for some reason, people are getting it younger and dying of it. (I do not believe it is the vax, fwiw, think it must be something else…though I do not dismiss there might be some impact on cancers from mRNA I don’t think that is the reason this is happening.)

setnaffa
setnaffa
7 months ago

Turbo-cancer is a thing from mRNA.

ChickenHead
ChickenHead
7 months ago

Everyone is full of shìt on all sides of the issue.

The vaxtards still think it is Safe & Effective, as long as you are up to date and accept that “they never said you wouldn’t catch covid.”

The anti-vaxxers are claiming every study shows wholesale death with the vaccine fully to blame… but when you read the study, it says no such thing.

The best I can tell, the covid vaccine has caused a small increase in a lot of bad things… as predicted… for the exact reason it was predicted.

However it is so small that nobody notices personally, so it essentially isn’t happening.

The thing to look for is what happens 20 years after the vaccine, as many predicted problems require time.

And, of course, notice what the statistics are oddly missing for.

Korean Person
Korean Person
7 months ago

The Gismaga are going crazy because of this;

“We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them, and doing everything they can to score political points from it.”

There’s nothing there that could be considered as inflammatory and only proves that Gismaga have extremely thin skins.

I also remember mentioning that those who can’t take a joke are “communists.”

So as per ‘s definition the Gismaga including and the Setnaffarians are “communists.”

Not surprising considering they are receiving money from China and Russia.

ChickenHead
ChickenHead
7 months ago

“I also remember mentioning that those who can’t take a joke are “communists.”

So as per ‘s definition the Gismaga including and the Setnaffarians are “communists.”

Not surprising considering they are receiving money from China and Russia.”

It is a true pleasure to watch you operate.

Your technique is textbook leftist, just dumbed down so anyone can see it in action.

Here we have:

– using fantasy logic to reach a predetermined conclusion that is a fantasy statement

– repeating nonsense over and over and over in hopes it becomes true in the minds of the weak

Of course those trick don’t work here but it is still fun to see them tried.

Korean Person
Korean Person
7 months ago

 Of course those trick don’t work here but it is still fun to see them tried.

It does.

It’s even working right now.

Stephen
Stephen
7 months ago

Trump has sucker punched Putin

Fox News

After getting to know and fully understand the Ukraine/Russia Military and Economic situation and, after seeing the Economic trouble it is causing Russia, I think Ukraine, with the support of the European Union, is in a position to fight and WIN all of Ukraine back in its original form,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social on Tuesday. “With time, patience, and the financial support of Europe and, in particular, NATO, the original Borders from where this War started, is very much an option.”

“Why not? Russia has been fighting aimlessly for three and a half years a War that should have taken a Real Military Power less than a week to win,” Trump said. “This is not distinguishing Russia. In fact, it is very much making them look like ‘a paper tiger.’”

Poor old setnaffa. Backed the wrong pony in Putin. Putin reciprocally backed the pony setnaffa.

Viva le Trump!

Down with Putin!

Down with Putin’s ponies

ChickenHead
ChickenHead
7 months ago

Stephen, if you knew anything about Trump you would see clearly what he is doing.

But you don’t because you form your opinions based off of what you are told to think rather than what you reason out.

So what happened?

Trump has changed his tune!

Trump has no shame in changing his opinion when the information changes.

This is in contrast to people who refuse to change their opinion even when they are clearly shown to be wrong and those who change their opinion becasue they want to say what they think others want to hear.

But Trump, in ususal Trump style, has set himself up to win no matter what happens.

He doesn’t think Ukraine can win. That nonsense is for the Eurotards to cheer. Putin knows Trump doesn’t think Ukraine can win either but Trump is playing a different game with Putin.

Let’s look at the situation.

Trump isn’t going to squander much more American resources to pester Russia or extend Ukraine’s well-deserved àsskicking. But he will be happy to sell American weapons to the EU to donate to Ukraine. This is a win for Trump, a win for America, a loss for Russia, a loss for the EU, and a loss for Ukraine disguised as a win.

This threat could bring Russia to the negotiating table. Russia is going to win no matter what happens but if winning becomes too expensive, maybe it is better to negotiate the most important demands. This is a big win for Trump (Nobel Peace Prize), a lesser win for America, a draw for Russia, maybe a win for the EU though they won’t see it that way, and a loss for Ukraine disguised as a win.

Or maybe the EU doesn’t bite and they stop assisting Ukraine (the Eurotards-on-the-Street are starting to wake up to all the unpleasant truths about war, economy, immigration, etc., even as the governments push for more of everything bad). So Trump does nothing, the EU does nothing, and Russia just keeps going. This is a win for Trump, a draw for America, a big win for Russia, a loss for the EU, and a big, likely existential, loss for Ukraine.

What will happen?

Generally, it is pretty silly to think the EU is going to spend money they don’t have for weapons America may be unable to quickly provide to give to a country with a shrinking pool of people to use them… but Europe is pretty silly. They must have this war for many reasons.

Whatever happens, Trump and America don’t lose.

But all you see is “but Trump.”

Stephen
Stephen
7 months ago

DJ Trump: “Russia has been fighting aimlessly for three and a half years a War that should have taken a Real Military Power less than a week to win”.

Could not be any clearer.

The First Rule of MAGA Club

Don’t talk smack about Trump

Only Putin’s ponies are being saddled up and spurred on by Kim Jong-eun here.

ChickenHead
ChickenHead
7 months ago

DJ Trump: “Russia has been fighting aimlessly for three and a half years a War that should have taken a Real Military Power less than a week to win”.

Again, this is part of the act.

Russia has not been fighting aimlessly. They have been fighting with a number of self-imposed restrictions to minimize damange to future Russian lands, avoid bad-will casualties of future Russian citizens, and maintain an amazing degree of moral highground for modern warfare.

Unlike America, they didn’t do the usual Shock & Awe that would have won the war quickly at the expense of major cities having no electricity, running water, or sewer.

When the country can’t function, the military can’t function.

Could they have won in less than a week? I don’t know. Let’s ask somebody experienced in Real Military Power war… like… uh… the guys who took 20 years of kicking the Taliban’s àss until they became a better armed Taliban.

Whatever the case, Russia was not fighting Ukraine. They were (are) fighting NATO on the Ukranian front… equipment, advisors, intel, coms, logistics, planning… all NATO… yet NATO didn’t kick Russia out in less than a week.

But Trump knows what he is saying and it will be effective to the audiences he is targeting.

Europe needs a war in a world with no real enemies. Russia is not a threat, China is only an economic enemy, the Muslim invaders already won their war.

If Europe goes to war with Russia and Belarus, America wins. America (and Korea) will be supplying weapons… and Trump takes assets in payment rather than bullshìt. If Ukrane surrensers and gives up the culturally Russian lands, America wins in a different way, as America starts looting of whatever is left of Ukraine, as per the agreement.

In fact, as long as we aren’t pointlessly pìssing resources into Ukraine, America wins no matter what happens.

That is a Trump-style deal.

ChickenHead
ChickenHead
7 months ago

Trump’s praise for Ukraine and criticism of Russia has made many blind to the fact that he is handing the problem once and for all to Europe to deal with…

…with the bonus that they will pay America to deal with it (through weapons purchases).

When you compare the management of this war between Biden and Trump, you realize only the stupidest people supported Biden or Stood with Ukraine (while they couldn’t afford a house or healthcare).

Korean Person
Korean Person
7 months ago

In other words and the Setnaffarians still support Russia and hope that Russia will take over Ukraine once and for all.

Not surprising considering that they always have been pro-Russia and are receiving money from Russia.

ChickenHead
ChickenHead
7 months ago

“Not surprising considering that they always have been pro-Russia and are receiving money from Russia.”

I don’t get money. I take it out in Russian pùssy.

Anyway, my politics have changed as the situation changed.

When America was footing the bill to prop up Ukraine, I wanted Russia to win quickly so America could spend on Americans.

When Trump negotiated America getting a piece of Ukraine’s action, I wanted Russia to lose quickly so there was more for Americans.

Now that Europe will buy American weapons to donate to Ukraine, I see nothing but benefits in a long, extened war.

– it will hold Russia back from taking more of America’s future assets

– fewer Ukranian men means less competition in everything from reconstruction contracts to slinky Slav honeys

– the Eurotards will continue spending money they don’t have for weapons and energy while driving even more of their industrial sector to America

– more high-paying defense jobs for Americans

– more money into the Korean economy due to weapons sales to poorer EU companies

– extended Ukrainian war delays a flood of mercenary expert drone operators getting into global mischief, from drugs to assasination… does nobody see this coming?

The problem is you follow the propaganda you are told to instead of thinking what is best for you.

And what is best for you can change rapidly when the situation changes.

My viewpoints sometimes appear to be pro-Russian only becasue Russia’s interests temporarily align with mine. And in all three examples, my interests are for what is best for America… which ultimately is best for me, as that’s what nations are for.

It baffles me how people can Stand with Ukraine while complaining about “the government not doing enough for me”. It baffles me how people support free healthcare and housing for illegal aliens while they cannot afford it for themselves. It baffles me how people can cry about sea level rise when all the people who told them to cry about sea level rise live in seaside mansions.

Then I remember that everybody I find baffling is a libtard, a mentality that attracts stupidity like flies to shìt.

There is no expectation of getting rationality from the fundamentally irrational.

Then I am no longer baffled.

18
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x