The classics are classic because they have timeless wisdom which, when applied properly, can help guide you through a happy, successful, and prosperous life.
From the importance of integrity to the concequences of obsession to the perils of ambition without morality, there are great lessons to reflect upon when evaluating goals, plans, and action.
When the classics are rejected for being too western or too white, I rejoice. This means only I have the secret wisdom to make superior decisions.
I will excel while everyone else sits around and complains about the dominance of white western culture and blames “racism” and “imperialism”.
Hopefully, they ban many other traits of the evil cis white patriarchy such as math, showing up to work on time, and “Yes, officer”.
Goldman, paid or not, is a shill for the reds. Only Xi’s Thoughts are allowed to ordinary Chinese citizens. Anyone trying to read Locke, Russeau, or Aristotle would be pisked up and likely incarcerated or disappeared
Good.
I LIKE to see the classics banned.
The classics are classic because they have timeless wisdom which, when applied properly, can help guide you through a happy, successful, and prosperous life.
From the importance of integrity to the concequences of obsession to the perils of ambition without morality, there are great lessons to reflect upon when evaluating goals, plans, and action.
When the classics are rejected for being too western or too white, I rejoice. This means only I have the secret wisdom to make superior decisions.
I will excel while everyone else sits around and complains about the dominance of white western culture and blames “racism” and “imperialism”.
Hopefully, they ban many other traits of the evil cis white patriarchy such as math, showing up to work on time, and “Yes, officer”.
Is Gordon Chang suggesting that David Goldman is lying, further implying that Goldman is a CCP shill?
Goldman, paid or not, is a shill for the reds. Only Xi’s Thoughts are allowed to ordinary Chinese citizens. Anyone trying to read Locke, Russeau, or Aristotle would be pisked up and likely incarcerated or disappeared
This should have been the tweet of the day:
… Locke, Russeau, or Aristotle …
Russeau? There’s a Freudian slip if ever there was one.
Russian Rupert at Moscow Murdoch Fox News would be ever so proud.
“Russeau? There’s a Freudian slip if ever there was one.”
Good catch on that Putinphile’s Freudian slit… slot… box… Frudian snatch… slip… Fraudian slip.
A tight fit but if the cap fits then you’re in like Flynn.
Golly, @stephen, your edication must have been sorely limited…
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Jacques_Rousseau
Being a grammar nazi must be terribly fulfilling.