Tufts University Professors Writes that Peace Treaty Would Likely Lead to End of the US-ROK Alliance

Professor Sung-Yoon Lee at The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University has an article published in the National Interest that hits many of the same theme I have shared on this site about any peace treaty signed with the DPRK:

Almost immediately in the wake of the signing of an end-of-war declaration, the UN Command, shorn of its mission to defend the peace in the peninsula, would be dismantled. Moreover, OPCON transfer, now envisioned to be completed by 2020, would defang and dismantle the Combined Forces Command. Why? Despite protestations to the contrary, no U.S. commander would submit his command over U.S. forces-the preeminent military in the world-to a foreign commander in the actual prosecution of war.
The  joint communique of the recently concluded 50th U.S.-ROK Security Consultative Meeting (SMC) states that the two sides, following OPCON transfer, shall “maintain the current CFC structure” and that the post-OPCON transfer CFC shall “have an ROK four-star general as the Commander and a U.S. four-star general as the Deputy Commander” (Paragraph 9). It’s a proposition that sounds as credible as Richard Nixon’s promise to Park Chung-hee that no U.S. troops will be withdrawn just a year before the withdrawal of an entire division of twenty thousand soldiers.
A peace treaty between the United States and the DPRK, a long-held goal by North Korea, would call into question rationale for maintaining U.S. troops in South Korea. If and when such a treaty comes into effect, then the question “Why are the troops there, in South Korea, when the U.S. and North Korea have a peace treaty?” would be raised repeatedly by politicians and the public in Seoul and Washington, not to mention Pyongyang, Beijing, and Moscow.
Once the U.S. forces leave South Korea, the bilateral alliance will be that only in name. Beyond the loss of credible U.S. commitment to the defense of the ROK, the virtual abrogation of the alliance would leave some glaring holes in the ROK’s defense capabilities, for example: Surveillance-reconnaissance-signal intelligence capabilities, early warning and missile defense, counter-battery fire and sensitive military technology procurement abilities, just to name a few.  [The National Interest]
You can read the rest at the link.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
J6Junkie
J6Junkie
5 years ago

Just as Fatty III wants it to be.

AppeasingNorthKorea
AppeasingNorthKorea
5 years ago

Of course everyone knows it will be the end. It’s like looking at the freight train coming down the corner, while people yelling that a train is coming, yet nobody cares. This is how South Korea is acting because Korea has leaders that are firmly in the North Korean pockets. Once the US is out of Korea and the US nuclear umbrella removed for South Korea, North Korea will be demanding South Korea to surrender. By that time, there will be internal pressure within South Korea to give in, and they’ll be using the same old arguments that they are using today. Peace at all cost.

setnaffa
setnaffa
5 years ago

Except for losing my favorite shops in Songtan and many of my wife’s family being serf’d or turf’d (as everyone under Fatty III is a slave or dead), I don’t see the downside here.

Our relationship with Japan would greatly improve, all maps could go back to calling the Sea of Japan the Sea of Japan, and except for the 48 Million (minus casualties) people who got exactly what they voted for and a few Hyundai, Kia, and Samsung customers, the world would be unchanged.

Smokes
Smokes
5 years ago

Why not? This way he can create a united Korean Army with the DPRK to defend against America; you know like how the French President just did in regards to Europe:

French President Emmanuel Macron Calls for a ‘European Army’ to Defend Against China, Russia and the U.S.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/french-president-emmanuel-macron-calls-021933558.html

Smokes
Smokes
5 years ago

Heh “just did” should read “just called for”. Whoops on that. 😎

setnaffa
setnaffa
5 years ago

Poland and others still like us…

7
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x