Why is President Trump Agreeing to Meet with Kim Jong-un?

I think before anyone gets to critical or excited about yesterday’s announcement that President Trump plans to meet Kim Jong-un by May, first lets see if in fact it happens.  A lot can happen over the next two months to where this does not happen.  However, if it does happen what does each side hope to get out of this US-DPRK summit?  Oh Young-jin from the Korea Times provides his viewpoint in the below article that President Trump is essentially being a showman trying to win a Nobel Peace Prize:

But what prompted Rocket Man to offer an invitation and the Dotard to take it?

There can be many circumstances in play for the summit, making but only one fundamental and undeniable fact ― a meeting of their mutual interests.

From Kim Jong-un’s perspective, a meeting with Trump would be of great benefit instantly for a change of air, so to speak. There is much speculation, some well thought out, that the U.S. might preemptively strike Pyongyang to stop it from making nuclear-armed intercontinental missiles that can hit the U.S. Then there are international sanctions that are putting a stranglehold on the impoverished nation.

Plus, if the North has not mastered its weapons of mass destruction, it is very close to it. Last November, it declared it had become a nuclear weapon state. Meeting Trump would buy time in the lead-up to May while the summit is being prepared and for months or so in the post-summit afterglow.

Even if the two reach major agreement ― renunciation of nuclear weapons or a return to the global nuclear regimes such as rejoining the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty ― the North would have an option of procrastinating.

That way, Kim would outlast Trump, who has three years left in office, with a lot of domestic challenges ahead. If Trump manages to get reelected, Kim might become mellower and not likely dare wage a potential nuclear war. All he would have to do is prepare for the next U.S. president.

For Trump, the summit would be an awesome ego trip ― showing the world and detractors that after all he is a great politician and statesman that they have failed to recognize.

Trump also could mock his detractors by saying his negotiating skills, as shown in his “The Art of the Deal,” had paid off in dealing with the North. He would set out to do what Bill Clinton, the husband of his nemesis Hillary Rodham Clinton, had failed to do ― go to Pyongyang to seal the denuclearization deal.

Perhaps a Nobel Peace Prize would cap his presidency through a “kind” of deal with the North. That would make him equal to Barack Obama, Trump’s Democratic predecessor who won the Nobel Prize at the start of his presidency.  [Korea Times]

You can read more at the link, but President Trump may be a showman, but I would be surprised if he agrees to anything that does not lead to the denuclearization of North Korea during his Presidency.  I haven’t seen any indication that the Trump administration wants to mortgage this problem off to someone else like prior Presidents have done.

Congressman Ed Royce who has been heavily involved with legislation involving North Korea believes the sanctions are working and President Trump needs to break the cycle of using talks to extract concessions and buy time:

Republican Rep. Ed Royce of California, chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said in a statement after the announcement, “Kim Jong-un’s desire to talk shows sanctions the administration has implemented are starting to work.”

Royce said that it is important to break the cycle of the North Korean regime using talks to extract concessions and buy time, adding, “The United States and South Korea must stand shoulder-to-shoulder in applying the sustained pressure needed to peacefully end this threat. And Beijing must do its part.”  [Joong Ang Ilbo]

If North Korea agrees to a Libya like denuclearization and ending of their ICBM program everyone will assuredly welcome that.  With that said I would also be very surprised if North Korea agreed to full denuclearization.  As I have stated before the Kim regime would likely like to get a freeze deal signed in return for reopening the Kaesong Industrial Park and the joint tourism tours with South Korea that would effectively end sanctions against them.  The freeze deal would continue the cycle of the Kim regime getting major concessions for little to nothing in return since they can restart their nuclear and ICBM programs at a time of their choosing like they have done with past deals.

ROK Drop favorite Dr. Andrei Lankov believes the Kim regime will negotiate for more time just like Congressman Royce warns about:

One expert told NK News that Thursday’s news suggests that this policy has, for the time being, “worked.”

“His pressure policy has succeeded in stopping the North Korean missile program, and basically pushed them to the negotiating table,” said Andrei Lankov, director of the Korea Risk Group, which owns and operates NK News.

“However, this does not mean this policy will keep working,” he warned. “Trump is likely to push for greater concessions, and there are limits of how hard he can push.”

“Most likely the North Koreans are going to win time, but if the U.S. starts pushing too hard for denuclearization Trump won’t get what he wants and it might backfire.”  [NK News]

So ultimately this summit may not lead to anything, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t helpful to Trump’s goal of denuclearization.  In the future if military action is taken, a summit with Kim Jong-un can be pointed to as one more thing the Trump administration has done to peacefully resolve the nuclear issue.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

15 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
JoeC
JoeC
6 years ago

Can serious talks occur if the President undercuts them the next day with a Twitter rant?

setnaffa
setnaffa
6 years ago

Can JoeC remember Trump got the Teamsters to deliver building materials in New York and New Jersey? I think we can safely assume he knows how to deal with powerful people…

J6Junkie
J6Junkie
6 years ago

This was probably an impulsive soundbite and the NSC, Pentagon have to deal with the reallife consequences.

Denny
Denny
6 years ago

Remember when people on this site thought Trump would militarily strike North Korea, and not engage diplomatically? lol

setnaffa
setnaffa
6 years ago

Gee… What made the norkistani leader want to talk?

J6Junkie
J6Junkie
6 years ago

I guess his supply of Swiss cheese got hit.

Ambrose Greenlee
Ambrose Greenlee
6 years ago

Would like to return, after 53 years I’m sure there is a world of difference. As I see in the pictures even Paved streets, when I was there not even electric or indoor plumbing.
Quite a place but some special people, really enjoyed my time there.

RockMarne
RockMarne
6 years ago

Trump is a wuss. There never was a chance that he would order a pre-emptive strike on the DPRK.

setnaffa
setnaffa
6 years ago

There is still a chance of a preemptiv strike on the norks. But then, even Rocktroll knows that. I hope we avoid it because most of my wife’s family in Korea live north of the Hangang…

Rascal1212
Rascal1212
6 years ago

I don’t think President Trump is going to watch this movie again.

RockMarne
RockMarne
6 years ago

There is no chance whatsoever that Trump will order a pre-emptive strike on the DPRK. He is a wuss.

ChickenHead
ChickenHead
6 years ago

“Remember when people on this site thought Trump would militarily strike North Korea, and not engage diplomatically?”

The very credible threat of a military strike was the first diplomatic engagement.

This is called negotiating from a position of strength… something previous presidents didn’t manage.

The final diplomatic engagement may be with whoever is left standing after a military strike.

Don’t get too ahead of yourself.

What is currently happening may be a secret from you… but it isn’t from North Korean spies… and it has temporarily tamed them.

setnaffa
setnaffa
6 years ago

“What If” by Joshua Goodling: http://joshuagoodling.com/article2.html

The Polish gun
The Polish gun
6 years ago

Let’s pray a deal is made and we have peace.

15
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x