Why North Korea Wants Nukes

There is a new Asia Times article out today by William Polk, that discusses North Korea’s nuclear program. The article begins by giving the mandatory why America is the reason for all the bad things in the world that is now prevalent is most Asia Times articles. Then it gets into why certain countries are trying to build nuclear weapons including North Korea. Here is Polk’s reasoning for why the North Koreans want nuclear weapons:

This, in brief, is what I guess a North Korean policy planner would start with. So how would he advise his government. Putting myself in his shoes, I guess that he would advise that, in light of American pronouncements and actions, North Korea would be foolish to give up its nuclear force. Indeed, to deter an American attack, it should enhance its military capacity.

Psychologically, moreover, it should seek to convince the US that it would fight the Americans and their allies, with what the Israelis called the “Samson option”, that is, even to the point of national suicide. Further threats are likely only to convince the North Korean government of its danger and so increase its determination to protect itself at any cost.

Really nothing new here. We all know the North Koreans want nuclear weapons not only to protect themselves from American invasion but also to extract foreign aid to keep the regime a float. Now the trick for them is going to be getting the international aid and secretly keeping their nuclear weapons. The prior disarmament framework by President Clinton that was meant to stop their nuclear program didn’t work because the North Koreans went ahead and kept making weapons anyway while enjoying the free international aid because there was no rigid inspection guidelines to ensure compliance. They just kept real quiet about it and gave the appearance of behaving. This will be the same deal they will be looking for at this next round of talks starting this month on the 25th of July. The North Koreans just want a nice face saving deal that gives them the free food, money, and the oil they need to keep the regime going plus have enough flexibility in the agreement to be able to covertly hide their weapons program.

In turn they will keep quiet and give the appearance of good behavior to the international community, all the foreign diplomats can pat each other on the back about what a great job they did, heck maybe somebody can even get a Nobel Peace Prize out of this like Kim Dae Jung did back in 2000. All the while the North Koreans will be sitting back enjoying their spoils, their people still starving, make no progress on human rights, and continue to covertly make nuclear weapons.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Silly Sally
Silly Sally
19 years ago

As the Anglican and Catholic priests are currently saying in London: "There are no Islamic terrorists … just terrorists who claim to be Muslims."

Thus, there is no Korean rogue-regimes, just rogue-regimes that claim to be Korean.

GI, somehow, I would expect this to ring logical in your multi-cultured brain.

Shane
Shane
19 years ago

I really wish that the international community would get its act together and finally shut down the "North Korean Welfare Fund" once and for all. We keep Kim and and his band of loyalists on life support year after year while he keeps his gulags packed and his people starving. Where is the international outcry for the suffering of the North Korean people?

Cut them off and let the government implode.

I understand that the nations in that region are afraid that a desperate DPRK will lash out militarily, but how credible is that fear? And even if it does happen, the North Koreans are a shadow of their once-fierce selves. Their forces are hollow and weak, while their neighbors (especially their cousins in the ROK) are militarily superior to them in almost every conceivable way. Kim Jong Il attacking Japan, or South Korea would only accelerate regime change in a most spectacular way.

Most frustrating indeed.

2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x