Author: GIKorea

Despite the current trade and defense spats with the Trump administration the people of Korea still hold a very pro-US view according to this survey:

Nine out of 10 South Koreans regard the United States as their most important ally, with only a small minority viewing it as a significant threat.

According to the latest findings from the U.S.-based Pew Research Center, released Tuesday local time, 89 percent of South Korean respondents identified the United States as their country’s most vital ally.

The survey, conducted between Jan. 8 and April 26, included 28,033 respondents across 25 major countries. In South Korea, 1,042 adults aged 18 and older were interviewed by telephone during that period. (……….)

South Korea ranked second overall in pro-U.S. sentiment, following only Israel, where 95 percent of respondents named the U.S. as their most important ally. In comparison, 78 percent of Japanese respondents said the same, falling behind South Korea in terms of favorable views toward the U.S.

Korea Times

You can read more at the link.

One commentator at the Korea Times thinks so:

Just a day after stirring a beehive for Korean negotiators and the government engaged in tariff talks with the United States, U.S. President Donald Trump said that Korea pays “very little” for America’s military support and should pay much more for its defense. Under a bilateral military alliance, there are 28,500 U.S. military personnel stationed in Korea.

“We rebuilt South Korea. We stayed there. It’s OK. We rebuilt it and we stayed there, and they pay us very little for the military,” Trump said during a Cabinet meeting. “South Korea is making a lot of money and they are good … But you know, they should be paying for their own military.”

It’s the latest in a series of dramatic comments that the U.S. president has hurled at Korea. Trump on the campaign trail had said that Korea would be paying $10 billion a year if he were in the White House. (……..)

The time has come for officials to engage in talks based on data and numbers but also in a mutually beneficial and respectful manner. The U.S., for its part, should seriously consider the adverse impact its excessive demands on traditional allies such as South Korea will have on the deterrence against North Korea and — more profoundly for the U.S. — China. Alliances should not be sacrificed for the unilateral and transactional pursuit of short-term national interests as sought by the Trump administration.

Korea Times

You can read more at the link, but the alliance will survive the Trump administration. However, if the ROK does not agree to the strategic flexibility that the Pentagon is looking for then this could cause some changes to the alliance.

The rhetoric from President Trump has shifted from NATO to now South Korea in effort to get them to increase defense spending:

 U.S. President Donald Trump said Tuesday that South Korea pays the United States “very little” for America’s military support and should pay for its own defense, amid expectations that he would demand the Asian ally shoulder a greater security burden.

Trump made the remarks during a Cabinet meeting, reinforcing speculation that his administration might demand that Seoul sharply increase its spending on national defense or its share of the cost for stationing the 28,500-strong U.S. Forces Korea (USFK).

“We rebuilt South Korea. We stayed there. It’s okay. We rebuilt it,” Trump said. “And we stayed there, and they pay us very little for the military.”

He cast South Korea as “making a lot of money” — a remark that further raised pressure on Seoul to jack up its defense spending.

Yonhap

You can read more at the link, but the ROK government had to know this was coming considering President Trump’s past rhetoric demanding the ROK to pay more for the upkeep of USFK. We should soon see how they respond to the demand from Trump.

This seems to be a trial balloon warning of what could happen to USFK if the ROK is not cooperative in allowing U.S. military units in Korea to be used to respond to regional crisises. The recent deployment of Patriot missile defense units off the peninsula shows that the ROK was cooperative with that deployment:

A U.S. think tank recommended a reduction of the U.S. Forces Korea (USFK) troop level to about 10,000 from the current 28,500 in a report released Wednesday, amid speculation that the Pentagon might weigh the idea of a troop drawdown on the Korean Peninsula to prioritize deterring Chinese threats.

Defense Priorities, a Washington-based institution, released the report, titled “Aligning global military posture with U.S. interests,” saying that the U.S. troop presence should be reduced even further if Seoul limits the U.S. ability to use USFK assets to address other regional security crises outside the peninsula.

The report was written by Jennifer Kavanagh, senior fellow and director of military analysis at the think tank, and Dan Caldwell, a former senior adviser to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

The think tank recommended cutting all ground combat units not tied to base security from South Korea, along with Army signal, intelligence, and headquarters units, and some of their associated support and sustainment units — a reduction that would remove most of the 2nd Infantry Division from Korea, including the rotational brigade combat team and Army combat aviation units.

It also said that the U.S. should cut airpower based in Korea, moving two fighter squadrons from U.S. bases in South Korea back to the U.S. and that about a third of air maintenance and other support units and personnel can also be returned stateside.

“In total, this would reduce the total U.S. military presence in South Korea by more than 50 percent, leaving about 10,000 personnel along with two fighter squadrons (including a larger super squadron) and support forces.

“The ground personnel left would be primarily for support, sustainment, logistics, and maintenance, leaving the responsibility for combat operations in the event of any crisis on the peninsula to South Korean forces.”

Yonhap

You can read more at the link.

Here is the latest in regards to where South Korea stands in the global trade war with the Trump administration:

Calls are mounting for Seoul to refrain from signing a tariff deal hastily with Washington, as the leaders of Japan and other U.S. trade partners criticized U.S. President Donald Trump’s letters threatening “reciprocal” tariffs he said will take effect on Aug. 1.

Amid the limited impact of the U.S. tariff threats on the stock market, speculation is also growing that the Lee Jae Myung administration will maintain a cautious approach — though it has ostensibly vowed to accelerate trade negotiations.

After receiving Trump’s letter Tuesday, Lee remained silent on the issue during public events. The presidential office also said Kim Yong-beom, presidential chief of staff for policy, prioritized the national interest over immediate negotiations during an emergency meeting with relevant ministry officials that day. (……)

Rep. Kim Joon-hyung of the minor opposition Rebuilding Korea Party, a former chancellor of the Korea National Diplomatic Academy, said in a radio interview Wednesday that Korea should be in solidarity with Japan to reject unilateral requests from the U.S.

Myongji University professor Kim Tae-hwang advised Korea to align with Japan and the European Union, both of which are key trade partners of the U.S.

These suggestions were backed by Trump’s inconsistency in the tariff deadline, which has been ridiculed with the term “TACO,” which stands for “Trump always chickens out.” According to Forbes, the U.S. president has flip-flopped 28 times regarding his tariff policy.

Korea Times

You can read more at the link, but Trump has actually brought Korean leftists in line with Japan due to the current trade dispute.

Not a good look in regards to whatever was going on here:

A special counsel team said Wednesday it has launched an investigation into allegations surrounding a close acquaintance of former first lady Kim Keon Hee.

The team led by special counsel Min Joong-ki said the woman, surnamed Kim and known as the former first lady’s “stewardess,” left the country in April and has not returned.

The woman is suspected of having received 18 billion won (US$13 million) in investments from businesses through irregular means.

“We confirmed that she transferred the addresses of her office and family members,” assistant special counsel Moon Hong-ju said during a press briefing. “We plan to take steps, including invalidating her passport.”

Yonhap

You can read more at the link.