Will North Korea Use Nuclear Weapons for Forceful Reunification?

ROK Drop favorite Andrei Lankov thinks that North Korea is building their nuclear weapons program to forcefully reunite the peninsula and the Hankyoreh disagrees with this assessment:

North Korean state-run KCTV showed the above footage on May 27, 2022, of Kim Jong-un directing a rehearsal ahead of the April 25 military parade. (Yonhap News)

In a recent interview with the Chosun Ilbo newspaper, Kookmin University professor Andrei Lankov said that North Korea has “had great success with focusing all its national capabilities on developing nuclear weapons and missiles.” He went on to say that North Korea’s plans for a forced reunification under communism are “not a dream, but a reality.”

As a basis for that prediction, he explained, “If the US were to fight to protect Seoul, the US president would have to consider the possibilities of Los Angeles, San Francisco, or New York suffering multiple North Korean intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) strikes that cause countless casualties.” (……)

Also, how would the US react to North Korea threatening to strike its major cities with ICBMs to force it to stay out of the situation? Would it bow to those threats in order to avoid suffering its own losses?We don’t need to think too hard to find the answers. The South Korea-US alliance would respond to the North’s threat of nuclear strikes by showing their ability and willingness to retaliate forcefully. If the North actually did use tactical nuclear weapons, it would respond with massive retaliation.

Hankyoreh

You can read much more at the link, but I actually agree some what with both viewpoints. As things stand now North Korea will not use its nuclear weapons to forcibly reunite the peninsula because of the massive retaliation they would face and US missile defenses that mitigates their ICBM threats.

However this may not be the case in the future. The Kim regime has clearly been working to undermine the US-ROK alliance, most notably by pushing for the Korean War peace treaty during the prior Moon administration. If the US agreed to a peace treaty then that draws into question the existence of the US-ROK alliance. Any effort to forcibly reunite the peninsula requires the Kim regime to break up the US-ROK alliance.

They also need a credible threat to the US homeland. Right now their ICBMs cannot penetrate US missile defense defending the American continent. However, the Kim regime continues to test their ICBMs likely focusing on developing countermeasures to penetrate US missile defenses.

I there are no US troops in South Korea and North Korea has a credible nuclear threat to US cities would the US respond to threats made to the ROK? I think the answer to that question really depends on relations between the ROK and US at the time. I think it is more likely though the Kim regime will use their nuclear weapons to create a crisis to extort the ROK with.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Stephen
Stephen
3 years ago

“They also need a credible threat to the US homeland.”

The problem for bluffers like Kim and his pal Putin is that they know the US isn’t bluffing.

Only twice have atomic weapons been used in history.

Both times by US.

ChickenHead
ChickenHead
3 years ago

Putin isn’t bluffing either.

Russia is not giving up Crimea and Donbas and maybe the entire coastline through Odessa and to Moldova.

(We are going to see some action in Odessa within hours)

Try to take this away and the third nuke in recent history might get used.

J6Junkie
J6Junkie
3 years ago

Slim Fatty would have to hope President Lee Jail Myung would unconditionally surrender after that. Or else North Korea is becoming a nuclear cinder.

setnaffa
setnaffa
3 years ago

While we don’t know what fevered dreams pass through Kim Fatty’s mind at night, I would be less worried about commie nukes than those in Islamist control.

Typically, commies want to gain pr maintain control over people. Nukes disrupt the Three C stuff.

Some Islamists, notably former Iranian leaders, want to provoke the end of the world when they believe Islam will rise from the ashes like a type of apocalyptic phoenix.

Yeah, the dictators, while still dangerous, are less scary than the zealots.

ChickenHead
ChickenHead
3 years ago

Word on the Street: The people in the know in Iran are positioning themselves for something.

The people who watch the people in the know think it is regime change or maybe attack by Israel.

Whatever the case, something is clearly going on under the surface.

Not my business so I share it with you… as most of you won’t believe it and none of you will act on it.

Enjoy the coming world war.

Korean Man
Korean Man
3 years ago

Alt Right-Wing American’s wettest dream imaginable.

Also, how would the US react to North Korea threatening to strike its major cities with ICBMs to force it to stay out of the situation? Would it bow to those threats in order to avoid suffering its own losses?We don’t need to think too hard to find the answers. 

Yes we all know what that answer is. So it makes so much sense that the US still stupidly restricts South Korea from obtaining its own nukes and obtaining nuke submarines to counter these threats from anywhere in the oceans. I really think the US government loves the idea that South Korea is helplessly dependent on it. How else to explain why the US stubbornly holds to the idea that’s now seriously outdated.

setnaffa
setnaffa
3 years ago

Back in the mid-’90s, I was on a business trip to Germany. Outside a busy shopping area, there was one pretty young girl and 5 homely, pimple-faced drones selling a commie rag whose leading headline was “Stalin wasn’t so bad.”

That’s why there are so many ugly drones on the internet pushing leftist porcine scat. It’s the same model used in all the “buy me drink” places around the world. Losers will do anything for a chance to get close enough to smell a pretty girl’s perfume.

So pardon me for having contempt for all leftists everywhere. advocating the policies that killed nearly 200 Million people in the 20th Century, not counting the family and culture destroying effects of over 60 Million legal abortions since Roe v. Wade, does not make me celebrate diversity.

Coprophagist catemites and other incels are the only “men” who support communism. On the other hand, the pretty girls are well-paid for using their “talents”. And they get their pick of the litter. But they still wake up with fleas.

Screenshot_1.jpg
ChickenHead
ChickenHead
3 years ago

The only good thing about communism is it is very good at killing communists.

Bonus: The Warsaw Pact is the only alliance I can think of in history that only attacked itself.

8
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x