South Korea Asks North Korea to Remove Artillery from the DMZ

Removing the North Korean artillery from areas along the DMZ would be a huge concession by the Kim regime which is why I would be surprised to see this happen:

Military officials from the two Koreas hold rare talks at the inter-Korean truce village of Panmunjom on June 14, 2018, in this photo released by the joint press corps. (Yonhap)

South Korea proposed that North Korea move its long-range artillery away from the heavily fortified border in an effort to reduce tensions during last week’s rare cross-border military talks, government sources here said Sunday.

During Thursday’s general-grade meeting, the first in more than a decade, Seoul made a series of suggestions, including relocating the artillery pieces to areas 30 to 40 kilometers away from the Military Demarcation Line separating the two Koreas, the insiders said.

The two sides held the talks to follow up on the Panmunjom Declaration from the April 27 inter-Korean summit at the truce village, which calls for joint efforts to alleviate military tensions and “practically eliminate the danger of war.”

“We conveyed our position to the North that in light of consultations between the North and the United States over the denuclearization issue, we have to craft measures to drastically reduce military tensions by removing practical threats,” a source said on condition of anonymity.

“I understand that (the South) suggested moving the North’s artillery that threatens the Seoul metropolitan area to rear areas so as to actively implement the Panmunjom Declaration,” the source added.

According to a 2016 South Korean defense white paper, the North has 14,100 artillery pieces, including 5,500 multiple rocket launchers, a majority of which have been deployed near the border.

Pyongyang is known to possess a variety of rocket systems, including 170 mm-caliber self-propelled howitzers and 240 mm multiple rocket launchers that can easily target Seoul and surrounding areas.

The North’s longer-range 300 mm multiple rocket launcher is seen as more formidable, as it is capable of reaching key U.S. military installations in Pyeongtaek in Gyeonggi Province and the headquarters of the South’s Army, Navy and Air Force in the Gyeryongdae military compound in South Chungcheong Province.  [Yonhap]

You can read more at the link, but North Korea’s artillery has been their source of deterrence for decades.  If it wasn’t for North Korea’s artillery threat on Seoul a regime change war would have likely happened by now considering the outrageous provocations the Kim regime has committed over the years.

Removing the artillery from its carefully hardened positions on the DMZ would ultimately be a threat to regime security which is why I would be surprised to see this happen.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Flyingsword
Flyingsword
6 years ago

Even if they agree how will it be verified?

Rascal1212
Rascal1212
6 years ago

I suggested this some posts back. Great way for KJU to so some sincerity. Verification difficult.

J6Junkie
J6Junkie
6 years ago

Typical Korean style: smile, nod but do nothing. Fatty is playing us all like a harp.

MTB Rider
MTB Rider
6 years ago

How would you verify? I would think moving those big pieces of equipment up the roads would be fairly easy to notice.

I certainly noticed all the Heavy Metal heading up through Uijeongbu and Yangju when the Cheonan was sunk.

It’s not like you can just load that into the back of a Bongo and throw a blue tarp over it.

Yeah, I know about the tunnels, but I’m not how far they go back, or how many spare guns are parked behind the primary.

The North might try the old Three Card Monte hustle though. “Chase the Ace, don’t be fooled by the Jacks! Put your money down for a chance to double up!”

Flyingsword
Flyingsword
6 years ago

MTB, corps movements have been missed in nK. Unless someone is there to verify an agreement isn’t worth diddly.

5
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x