University Professor Fired for Making Comments Critical of the Comfort Women Narrative

This guy should have known better than to make these type of comments in South Korea:

Sunchon National University

Sunchon National University has dismissed one of its professors for making derogatory comments about Korean women who were forced into sexual slavery for the Japanese military during World War II.

Six out of seven members of the university’s disciplinary committee in the city of Sunchon, South Jeolla Province, chose the severest level of punishment for the professor, whose name is withheld, on Wednesday. He was charged with failing to fulfill his duty faithfully and failing to preserve his vocational dignity.

University President Park Jin-sung apologized for “those hurt by the blasphemous comments made by our school professor, especially the women who had gone through the ordeal in Japan.”

He said the school suspended the professor after the incident was reported in April and formed a task force to investigate the matter.

The professor, 56, from the university’s teachers’ college, made the comments during a lecture. He said many of the women, also known as “comfort women,” “probably knew that they were going to sexually serve the Japanese soldiers and thus voluntarily left for Japan. He also said all the women were “crazy about Japan and would not have gone there if it weren’t for their (sexual) passion.”   [Korea Times]

You can read the rest at the link, but he is not the first academic fired for making comments against the comfort women dogma. Professor Park Yu-ha at Sejong University was arrested for defamation for writing a book that takes a balanced look at the comfort women issue.  She was fortunately found innocent.

The Korean public likes to think that all the comfort women were girls sleeping in bed and kidnapped by evil Japanese soldiers while the Japanese rightists like to think they were all willing prostitutes.  Both historical narratives are untrue if one really looks at the history.

What Professor Park wrote about is the same historical narrative that American Sarah Soh wrote about in her book “The Comfort Women: Sexual Violence and Postcolonial Memory in Korea and Japan“.  In the book Soh provides documented evidence that most of the Korean women put into the comfort women system were sold by Korean brokers.  The actual kidnapping of Korean women by Japanese soldiers would be a very rare occurrence when the broker system made so many of these women readily available.  This does not absolve the Imperial Japanese from responsibility since they ran the comfort woman system that provided the demand for the Korean brokers to meet.  To make even worse is that many of these girls were teenagers when sold into prostitution.  I see no way that a young teenager should be considered a willing prostitute.  Especially when many girls were sold by their families into prostitution for money due to the extreme poverty.  This was actually a practice that was going on well into the US military era in South Korea.

It is pretty clear that the comfort women issue is not black and white, but has more nuance to it then each side is willing to admit.  Ultimately the Imperial Japanese government was responsible for the actions of the Korean brokers that supplied the majority of the Korean girls.  The Imperial Japanese had to have known how young the girls were and the unethical and deceptive actions the Korean brokers were taking to make them available to the Japanese military.  There is no need to rewrite the history of what happened to the comfort women when the truth is bad enough.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mike Morgan
Mike Morgan
6 years ago

Freedom of speech around universities always means freedom to push the party line. The fired guy might have done better to pick a less controversial topic or appeared less offensive toward old women who — if he is right — might just be regretting career choices made long before he was born, under circumstances for which he obviously doesn’t have any empathy.

See Spencer Tracy’s attitude toward Marlene Dietrich in Judgement at Nuremberg: http://www.tcm.com/mediaroom/video/306205/Judgment-At-Nuremberg-Movie-Clip-I-m-Not-Fragile.html

ChickenHead
ChickenHead
6 years ago

When is USFK going to apologize for the EXACT SAME BUSINESS MODEL?

…Korean brokers supplying women to American GIs while USFK went through stages from encouragement to intentional ignorance to talk-but-no-action to fake action to reluctant action to whatever it is now.

Some were willing. Some were not. I saw an ajuma beat a girl with a shoe when a guy drug her back to the club because she wouldn’t put out after he paid a couple hundred dollar bar fine. Between that, her passport taken away, and being locked up at night, she didn’t seem so willing.

One could speculate the comfort woman system worked somewhat like this.

Reading about the juicygirl system being pretty much exactly the same in Roman times (including soldiers falling for bargirls) could lead one to believe the comfort woman system shared many of the key points.

2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x